Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Survivor Finale

-I think that JT and Stephen should not have voted Taj off. First of all, they made promises to each other from the start, they had an alliance they actually stuck to. And I felt that Taj was a better player than Erinn, and she deserved to get further in the game. I think that Taj should have at least been in the final three.
-If Stephen had taken Erinn to the final two, I would have thought that Stephen was not really good person, but that he was a good, strategic player for thinking ahead and choosing Erinn. But I would not have been happy with Stephen for not picking JT.
-I think that two very strong players made it to the end. Everybody had strengths in different areas, so it is hard to decide who the strongest overall was. But I believe that both JT and Stephen deserved to be there. They worked hard and proved that they were strong.

The only problem with the reunion show is that it is too short. I would love to get to see and hear about how the players interacted with each other. I would love to hear more of their comments on why they acted they way they did.

3 comments:

  1. I agree with everything you said.

    I still think on the reunion show Coach's lie detector test was some silly made up BS kind of like everything he said on the show but hey thats just my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree; they broke their promise to Taj, but it was a strategic move in winning the game.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that Stephen and JT should not have voted Taj off. If JT was willing to keep his promise to Stephen then he should have shown Taj that same respect.

    ReplyDelete